[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cap orientation
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Cap orientation
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:30:23 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:36:22 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <yxjorD.A.iS.3McVCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 6 Apr 2005, at 21:45, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Steven Steele" <sbsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are you shure? because we used an o-scope and a funtion generator set
> to the 100 range. I guess well have to double check. 833Hz may indeed
> simply be one of the nodes. Thanks.
Steven, I am hazarding a guess based on what I've read that your
secondary might be resonating at 833Hz because you have built a
multilayer winding on it. Correct? If so, you have just wound a
lemon. You can prove it to yourself in operation. Capacitors have no
minimum voltage requirements - they simply are.
Malcolm
> Steven Steele
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> To:
> <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 7:53 PM Subject:
> Re: Cap orientation
>
>
> >Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I made a typo
> >
> >On Apr 6, 2005 12:43 AM, Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please check your decimal places over again. Your frequency is
> > > off by about 10^3 and your capacitance by 10^10.
> >
> >Should be 10^2, not 10^10.
> > >
> >
> >Steve Ward
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>