[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Golka Photos
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Golka Photos
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:40:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Old-return-path: <email@example.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:42:35 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <5Ho7cB.A.PaF.ZsfUCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Paul B. Brodie" <pbbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In the new photos Mike posted, the picture labeled "Inside Building View
Coil At Climax Mine Leadville Co.jpg" appears to show the coil built on top
of a raised floor, maybe as much as 2 feet off the ground. Someone had
mentioned that the coil may have suffered from some parasitic losses due to
being on the ground.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: Golka Photos
> Original poster: David Speck
> I looked at the photos of the Golka coil that Malcolm posted.
> Perhaps this is a silly question but I wonder if the efficiency of the unit
> would have been better if the primary coils were higher above the
> ground. I've read that the earth is a pretty good conductor, and with the
> primary coil being nearly on the ground, it would seem like the earth would
> be like a big shorted turn. I could see the system wasting a lot of energy
> just heating the dirt inside the coil setup.
> Any thoughts?
>> I scanned a couple of photos I obtained a long time ago from some
>> Science magazine of Robert Golka's early replica of Tesla's CS coil.
>> Terry has kindly put them at: