[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grounding Problem???
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com>
In a message dated 1/24/02 7:25:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:
Winston,
You certainly are not overpowering your coil. I run my 6" coil up to 7 kva. I
use no corona rings. I do have a 33" x 6" toroid mounted on top of the
secondary with another 40" x 6" toroid mounted above that. The coil was
finished with several coats of polyurethane after winding. I don't recall, is
your primary flat - or inclined?
You can see pictures of this coil at my web site:
http://members.aol-dot-com/esondrmn/index.html
How does your set up differ from mine?
Ed Sonderman
>
> Hi John, Scot, All
>
> I have tried loosening the coupling quite a bit. To get rid of the
> racing sparks the coupling must be around 0.08. Spark length is pitiful
> in that case. I have tuned the coil as well as I can. The tuning point
> is about 1.5 turns in from the calculated point. Moving the tap just
> decreases spark length. I am running a 6 inch coil using two of those
> GE copier xfmrs for a supply. I'm using a 0.1 uF cap, for a bang size
> of approx. 5 joules. My specs are in the "Help! suicidal secondary"
> thread, except that I'm now using a smaller toroid of 6" by 22". I
> tried a 0.066 uF cap, but racing sparks remain. Spark length goes in
> the toilet too. On a good humid night, I can get a few 6 ft. strikes to
> the ground. Dry nights give short streamers, and long racing sparks
> :-(. I can't believe that I could be overpowering an epoxy coated 6 by
> 28 inch secondary with 1600 VA. I wish I had pictures of the secondary
> for everyone to see, 'cause it looks ridiculous with those insulating
> washers on it! Maybe I should give up and build a new system. Any
> suggestions? BTW, I did all the math for this coil (more than I needed
> to, actually), and everything looked fine.
>
> Thanks