Re: TC quesions

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "rheidlebaugh by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rheidlebaugh-at-zialink-dot-com>

some people dont understsnd that a series tuned primary and a parallel tuned
secondary is a tuned transformer circuit with all the problems of any
clasical tuned transformer problems and losses. An ostrics is a bird even
though it dosent fly it is still a bird.
  Robert  H  

> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:59:05 -0700
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: TC quesions
> Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:15:14 -0700
> 
> Original poster: "Metlicka Marc by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <mystuffs-at-orwell-dot-net>
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Tesla list wrote:
>> 
>> Original poster: "Steve Greenfield by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <alienrelics-at-yahoo-dot-com>
>> 
>> Not a bad explanation, except that it is -not- a
>> transformer.
> 
> Why would this not be considered or called a "transformer? doesn't it
> "transform" the low voltage\high current stored in the "high
> capacitance\low inductance" side into a corresponding equal power in the
> "low capacitance\high inductance" side, at high voltage\ low current?
> All things are equal, unless the resonant rise makes the difference?
> Basically, Isn't this the same thing an iron core transformer does?
> Excuse my dumb showing through, but If i don't ask, I wont know.
> Thanks,
> Marc M.
> 
> The primary has high capacitance and low
>> inductance and so has very high circulating currents
>> and relatively low voltage. The secondary has low
>> capacitance and high inductance so it has much lower
>> circulating currents and correspondingly higher
>> voltage.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>