[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: RESEARCH AT HUT
Tesla List wrote:
> Original Poster: "Marco Denicolai"<Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs.fi>
> snip
>
> I was thinking to build one or two bigger TCs (2-coil systems) but I am
> afraid that going bigger than a certain size I would get very easily
> strikes to the strike rail and nothing more. Is this true?
................................No, not necessarily. R Hull
................................
>
>
> For instance, with a TC with a secondary of 16", 48" tall (3:1):
..........................................This is almost the same size as the
old Nemesis system here in Richmond. R.
Hull..........................................
> - how long streamers do you think I could get, at most?
..........................................Tremendously long if set up
correctly. The 46" long wound Nemesis once did a 15 foot jump. It is all in
field control. With this element under operator control, nonsensical jumps
are
quite possible. Arc lengths 4X the secondary winding length are relatively
easy
in a well balanced system. R. Hull
.....................................
> - will I be limited by the distance to the strike-rail (is it a must to use
> 3-coil systems for long streamers)?
.................................................You will hit the strike rail,
sure, but who cares, you will also get those long 3X and 4X arcs as well.
The
TC is not a classically predictable electrical engine. Its arcs are much more
like lightning, especially with huge capacitive toploads. Magnifiers, or
three
coil systems, Will let you reach out a lot farther per unit resonator length,
but are tough to master. (even if one considers them to be no more than a
distributed resonator.) R.
Hull................................................
> - how much power (kW) do you think that TC would require?
....................................................................To really
make it cook? 10-15KW and about a 60"X12" toroidal loading (minimum)
Richard Hull, TCBOR