Herr Zap,
Here is a description of one SCR driven TC, circa 2000:
Original Poster: "Eddie Burwell" <eburwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Well, from my experiments with SCR based coils IGBTs look like the hot
ticket. IGBTs like SCRs are four layer devices and have "fixed" voltage
drops. This means the power lost in the switching device goes up linearly
with increasing current rather than I^2R as does a mosfet. The IGBTs have
some nice advantages over SCRs namely they turn on fast and they can be
switched off.
I tried using saturable reactors to effectively speed up the turn on
time
of the SCRs which works but causes other problems ( like holding the SCR
on
for an excessive period of time.) So I ditched the saturable reactors and
went to a 365A 1800V 60uS Tq SCR. This sucker is rated for 8000A peak.
This
works OK except that the SCR doesn't turn off until the primary cap is
almost empty. No first notch quenching:-(. In order to get first notch
with
a 100KHz coil a Tq of 5uS would be necessary. Unfortunately 5uS SCR are
kind
of rare and don't usually exceed 600v. As you head towards lower voltages
and higher currents and more capacitance keeping the inductance low enough
to hit the target resonance frequency becomes difficult. Not to mention
how
absurdly careful you need to be in order to minimize parasitic inductance.
If your cap has as much inductance as your primary then your primary will
only see half the voltage. This sort of thing can happen when your primary
has only one turn. So higher voltage is better!
A 1200V IGBT is sufficiently fast and can be turned off, but there
remains
one question. How far can they be pushed past their current rating for a
pulse? A 100A SCR can do 1000A for a brief pulse. Could a 45A IGBT make it
to 450A? The ratings on IRG4PH50U say 45A cont. 180A peak but there is no
indication in the data sheet as to how the max peak current relates to the
with of a pulse (for infrequent pulses). If They can hit 450A look out!
With my last experiments in solid state coiling I could pull about 18"
with a 1 joule cap fired 400 times per second. The SCR was barely warm.
quality caps are an absolute necessity! I started with some CDE SCRN222s.
Their internal connections were so poor the terminals got hot although the
rest of the cap was cool. With 10 joules per bang an IGBT coil should
start
to really perform!
To see my outdated web page with some of my early work look at:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~eburwell
Oh yeah.. IGBTs typically have internal anti-parallel diodes rated for the
same current as the IGBT. Convenient..
-----Original Message-----
From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Quarkster
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 10:50 AM
To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
Subject: Re: [TCML] mini Tesla coil specs
Hi Paul -
Since you had also mentioned driving a coil with a SISG switch, I wasn't
sure if "SRC" might be a new type of power switching circuit that you
might
have discovered somewhere. I suspected that you might have meant SCR, but
I
thought it would be better to ask for clarification.
In some industrial power-control systems, strings of series-connected SCRs
are used to obtain the high standoff voltage ratings required. Large
arrays
of series-connected high-voltage, high-current SCRs have shown up on eBay
that have power ratings of hundreds of KW. However, I think these are
primarily used in pulse-width-modulation power control of resistive loads.
SCRs typically have rather slow turn-on and turn-off characteristics,
compared to IGBTs or MOSFETs, so they are not optimum for any application
that requires high-frequency switching.
Over the years, there has been a fair amount of discussion on the TCML
concerning the use of SCRs as switches in Tesla coil primary circuits
(search the TCML archives at www.pupman.com). However, I don't recall
anyone
ever actually building a SCR-commutated Tesla coil. (If anyone is aware of
a
Tesla coil that successfully used SCRs as a primary switch, please speak
up!)
SCRs are used very successfully to drive high-voltage generators based on
iron-core automotive ignition coils, but this is quite different than a
resonant Tesla coil.
Regards,
Herr Zapp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Brodie" <pbbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TCML] mini Tesla coil specs
Sorry, Herr Zap.
Simply a typographical error. I am legally blind and I normally write
with
18 type size. It is very difficult for me to see what is on the screen
when I write with small type like this. I have set it to do it
automatically when I write with HTML. Please excuse the error. By the
way,
even though I am using plain text, is there any reason I can't use a
larger type size when writing to the TCML? I suppose I should be asking
Chip but in a way, I am. ;-)
Thanks for pointing out the error. That made my question rather
confusing,
I suppose.
Paul
Think Positive
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.52/2484 - Release Date: 11/06/09
07:38:00
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla