[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] MOT Measurements
Hi Bart,
15/30 eh?
Would these measurements (X2) work for the 15/60?
Joe
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:58:53 -0800, "bartb" <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:
> Hi All,
>
> I hope I'm not boring you with this (I'm sure some are). But I think the
> next step is to look at a 15/30 NST which has not been modified. I have
> a couple on hand (Franceformers). I have a "gut feeling" that we really
> don't know where shunted transformers (NST's, MOT's, etc.) are truly at.
> Some resonant charging may or may not be occurring with our tank cap
> values. All the programs (including my own Javatc) are looking at Cres
> of non-shunted transformers. The shunted transformer is a different
> beast and without measurements, only guesses.
>
> These transformers force leakage inductance via the shunts to apply
> regulation. This changes the transformer as we assume it to be as far as
> currents, voltages, Cres, etc. The load also changes the output. NST's
> will begin to suffer a voltage drop even with a small load. MOT's are
> current beasts, and they will require larger loads before significant
> change in output voltage is seen. Load impedance of shunted transformers
> is yet another set of tests that should be performed at some point.
>
> I'll run through my normal 10V increment routine with one of my 15/30's.
> I'll set a variac to as near 10V as I can get, then measure the open and
> short circuit primary currents as well as open secondary voltage. Then
> head up to 20V and do all again. This is my routine as it keeps the
> source voltage unchanging, and thus, the numbers for Ioc, Isc, Vin, and
> Vout are all in very good agreement. My plan is to first do this
> unloaded (basic transformer testing). But loading is yet another issue.
>
> If anyone has any additional thoughts, please let me know. For the NST,
> considering it's low power, I can will also measure true power as well
> as VA.
>
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
>
>
> bartb wrote:
> > For an unmodified NST (shunts in tact), I expect Cres to be somewhat
> > near what we would expect (maybe), but Cres will change depending on
> > magnetizing current and current through the magnetic shunts. The
> > shunts have inductance with the AC cycle, and as current is increased,
> > the leakage inductance is increased. The result is a rather
> > significant changing reactance dependent ultimately on the input
> > voltage, and thus Cres will not be a constant throughout a voltage
> > range (such as driving an NST with a variac). The impedance of a
> > shunted transformer is not constant with varying input voltages (which
> > is counterintuitive to non-shunted power transformers).
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bart
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
--
johnbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla