RE: [TCML] Primary angles

["Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>]

Sorry, but to be blunt, this is quite a load of new-age pseudoscience nonsense.

Gary Lau
MA, USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Harvey Norris
> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:10 AM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [TCML] Primary angles
>
>
> --- On Fri, 11/28/08, Lau, Gary <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Lau, Gary <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [TCML] Primary angles
> > To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 3:33 PM
> > I'm not sure there's any reason to use any primary
> > geometry other than a flat one, regardless of secondary size
> > or power.  It may seem that there's some efficiency to
> > using a conical primary - that it somehow
> > "focuses" or directs the primary energy towards
> > the secondary more effectively than a flat primary does.
> According to the neutral angle of magnetic forces on current lines in three
> dimensions this is not the imagined 90 degrees, but ~ 110 degrees; ie the angles
> between the four vertices of a cube connecting its eight corners; see the last pages
> of the Moon Model of the Nucleus;
> http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202005/MoonModel_F04.pdf
> Thus I am building eight triangular spiral coils put together as a regular octahedron
> of eight triangles fitted together with the minimal amount of interior volume to test
> this thesis here. FOUR magnetic fields,(NS pairs on parallel planes) can share the
> same space and have no mutual induction according to this remarkable thesis
> here. Since the angles there are 110 degrees, perhaps just a single 110 degree
> conical primary might be worth investigating.
> Sincerely Harvey D Norris

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla