RE: curious ballast behavior (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:27:24 -0600
From: S&JY <youngs@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Tesla list' <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: curious ballast behavior (fwd)

Scott,

Just a guess - perhaps your spark gap (if it is not a RSG) was unable to
quench and was power-arcing the majority of the time?  If so, you could try
the experiment again with more gap sections and a good blast of air through
the gaps.

--Steve Y.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:46 PM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: curious ballast behavior (fwd)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:44:15 -0400
From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: curious ballast behavior


Hey all,
     A few weeks ago I did an experiment, I removed the Ballast form my
4-MOT coil to see if my sparks would get bigger (not a good idea for my
setup, but a few couple second runs will not hurt anything).  They did
not, the arcs grew incredibly tiny, a few inches long.  I re-tuned, and
tuned, and tried every primary configuration available, but It never
worked.  Thinking I may have fried a MOT with my rash behavior, I put it
back on and tried again, the coil lit up like a champ.  I just thought
this was curious and felt like sharing it with the group, especially in
light of the "Bogus Ballast" thread a while back.  I know some people run
their MOTs without a ballast, but I guess I cannot without some other
design changes!

Scott Bogard.

_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts!  Play Star Shuffle:  the word scramble
challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1064 - Release Date: 10/11/2007
3:09 PM