Re: curious ballast behavior (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:01:08 -0400
From: futuret@xxxxxxx
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: curious ballast behavior (fwd)


Scott,



If you're using a static gap it may be power arcing due to

the higher current after you removed the ballast.

Even a rotary can sort of power arc and trail

the spark around the electrode path.



John

---


-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 9:46 pm
Subject: curious ballast behavior (fwd)





---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:44:15 -0400
From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: curious ballast behavior


Hey all,
     A few weeks ago I did an experiment, I removed the Ballast form my
4-MOT coil to see if my sparks would get bigger (not a good idea for my
setup, but a few couple second runs will not hurt anything).  They did
not, the arcs grew incredibly tiny, a few inches long.  I re-tuned, and
tuned, and tried every primary configuration available, but It never
worked.  Thinking I may have fried a MOT with my rash behavior, I put it
back on and tried again, the coil lit up like a champ.  I just thought
this was curious and felt like sharing it with the group, especially in
light of the "Bogus Ballast" thread a while back.  I know some people run
their MOTs without a ballast, but I guess I cannot without some other
design changes!

Scott Bogard.

_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts!? Play Star Shuffle:? the word scramble challenge 
with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct



________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com