RE: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:40:48 -0700
From: Anthony R. Mollner <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:  Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)

I agree with you Finn and I was also thinking that a slightly porous form
might make the wire all the easier because the windings would be able to
stay put while winding. Some kind or lathe turned coil form would be ideal.
Obviously, the thicker the gage of the wire, the easier it would be to keep
them from cross winding. Just my thoughts on that.
Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 5:14 PM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:26:16 +0200
From: Finn Hammer <f-h@xxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)

All,

I`d say that if you wind it from the skinny end towards the fat end,
winding should not pose any problems at all. In fact, it should be
easier, since the wire will tend to snuggle close together (good)
without any special effort.
The coilform could be made in any number of ways. I think I`l wait to
decide how, until I need one.

Guess this didn`t help much.

Cheers, Finn Hammer

Tesla list skrev:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:26:38 -0700
> From: Anthony R. Mollner <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [] conical secondary (fwd)
>
> Speaking of conical secondary, does anyone have any suggestions on making
> them and the coil form it self?
> Tony