Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson" <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dan,
I also would like to know the geometry if you have that info handy.
Your paper is excellent! But, it seems only the toroid geometry is
given. Everything else is electrical measurement. I see no reason
for a DRSSTC to be any different regarding the coupled or uncoupled
circuits. Anyway, it sure would be nice to have those dimensions if
you get the time.
Thanks,
Bart
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "James Zimmerschied" <zimtesla@xxxxxxx>
Dan,
the data you provided is very interesting. Especially the double
resonance peaks which seem very pronounced in your data. I have
been trying to work with a DRSSTC Terry's design) and find that the
tuning point predicted by JAVATC is way off (it predicts more
required primary turns than the coil likes to operate at). JAVATC
is usually real close for other coils I have built (classic TC's).
It could be that my DRSSTC likes to have the lower primary
inductance peak while JAVATC gives the higher inductance one?
Have you used JAVATC to predict the tuning point on your DRSSTC
III? If not could you provide the geometry of the coil under test
so that I can run the computation?
Thanks
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>Tesla list
To: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:06 PM
Subject: DRSSTC Tuning Paper (Rough Draft)
Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H"
<<mailto:daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
Here is a rough draft of the tuning study I recently completed for my
DRSSTC III system. This goes for further verifying what is presently
understood as far as DRSSTCs and tuning and provides additional data.
<http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf>http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf
Dan
<http://www.drsstcbook.com>http://www.drsstcbook.com