Re: DRSSTC Tuning Paper (Rough Draft)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "James Zimmerschied" <zimtesla@xxxxxxx>

The JAVATC calculated 4.26 turns for my primary and my coil only 
worked at 2.6 turns. This is a helical primary of 7.5 in dia  using #6 wire.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>Tesla list
To: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: DRSSTC Tuning Paper (Rough Draft)

Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" 
<<mailto:resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>


Jim:

What was the JAVA TC predicted number of turns?   And, what number of
turns did you find work the best in your setup?   In short, how many
turns less did you have to tap down to get the best spark output?


Dr. Resonance
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" 
<<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: DRSSTC Tuning Paper (Rough Draft)


>Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson" 
<<mailto:bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Hi Dan,
>
>I also would like to know the geometry if you have that info handy.
>Your paper is excellent! But, it seems only the toroid geometry is
>given. Everything else is electrical measurement. I see no reason
>for a DRSSTC to be any different regarding the coupled or uncoupled
>circuits. Anyway, it sure would be nice to have those dimensions if
>you get the time.
>
>Thanks,
>Bart
>
>Tesla list wrote:
>
>>Original poster: "James Zimmerschied" 
<<mailto:zimtesla@xxxxxxx>zimtesla@xxxxxxx>
>>
>>Dan,
>>the data you provided is very interesting. Especially the double
>>resonance peaks which seem very pronounced in your data. I have
>>been trying to work with a DRSSTC Terry's design) and find that the
>>tuning point predicted by JAVATC is way off (it predicts more
>>required primary turns than the coil likes to operate at). JAVATC
>>is usually real close for other coils I have built (classic TC's).
>>
>>It could be that my DRSSTC likes to have the lower primary
>>inductance peak while JAVATC gives the higher inductance one?
>>
>>Have you used JAVATC to predict the tuning point on your DRSSTC
>>III? If not could you provide the geometry of the coil under test
>>so that I can run the computation?
>>
>>Thanks
>>Jim
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>Tesla>mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>Tesla list
>>To: 
<<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:06 PM
>>Subject: DRSSTC Tuning Paper (Rough Draft)
>>
>>Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H"
>><<<mailto:daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>mailto:daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>>Here is a rough draft of the tuning study I recently completed for my
>>DRSSTC III system.  This goes for further verifying what is presently
>>understood as far as DRSSTCs and tuning and provides additional data.
>>
>><<http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf>http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf>http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf>http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/tuning01.pdf
>>
>>
>>Dan
>><<http://www.drsstcbook.com>http://www.drsstcbook.com>http://www.drsstcbook.com>http://www.drsstcbook.com
>>