[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCB revisited near a Ca super fund site - public liability
Original poster: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At 12:06 PM 12/4/2006, Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Peter Terren" <pterren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Here in Australia liability insurance is $10
million which is standard. After a day of phone
calls, the best cover I could get was $1500 for
6 public shows of a small TC. Seems a tall
price to pay for interest in Science, Physics
and Math. I asked what a Pony club premium was
with the risk of making children quadriplegic if
they fall off. The answer: "they pay less".Go figure.
It's the price of supporting our agrarian and
pastoral heritage. It also helps that there's a
lot more pony clubs than tesla coils, so they
have a better feel for the actual risk exposure
for the pony clubbers. (as in decades, if not
centuries). While falling off is pretty common
(yep, done it myself, more than once), serious
injuries, on a "per exposure" basis are actually
fairly rare (or at least comparable to a lot of
other activities). I was interested to discover
a few months ago that half of the serious head
injuries in connection with horses are sustained
to a person on the ground, not the rider. (kicks,
etc) There's also well established procedures in
the horse business (or, more properly,
traditions) as to things like how far the
audience should be, who can go which places when,
and all that. People, in general, learned
centuries ago not to stand right behind a horse.
(granted I know of people who clearly didn't
figure this out, even after getting hurt, but
that's what the Darwin awards are for). The same
cannot be said of tesla coils.
Jim
It seems that an injury (severe enough to require
medical treatment) occurs about once per 1000
exposures for horseback riding. (my own
experience and that of acquantainces seems to be
in that sort of ballpark.. out of 50 or so riders
at my local barn, there's probably one or two
serious injuries a year). Since the mandatory
helmet rules went into effect about 15 years ago
(for competition in the US), the fraction of head
injuries has gone down significantly (but neck
injuries have increased... such is life).
On that basis, being a spectator at a tesla coil
exhibition is a whole lot less dangerous than participating at a horse show.
A quick google turned up, for instance:
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Volume 73 Issue 5 Page 331 - May 2003
doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02618.x
Volume 73 Issue 5
Original Article
Spinal and spinal cord injuries in horse riding:
the New South Wales experience 1976 1996
Justin P. Roe* Thomas K. F. Taylor* Ian A.
Edmunds* Robert G. Cumming Stephen J. Ruff* Meg
D. Plunkett-Cole* Marje Mikk§ and Richard F. Jones§
Objectives: The objective of the present study
was to determine the incidence of acute spinal
cord injuries (ASCI) in all forms of horse riding
in New South Wales (NSW) for the period 1976
1996. Other aims of the present study were to
compare and contrast ASCI with vertebral column
injuries (VCI) without neurological damage and to
define appropriate safety measures in relation to
spinal injury in horse-riding.
Design: A retrospective review was done of all
ASCI cases (n = 32) admitted to the two acute
spinal cord injury units in NSW for the cited
period. A comparable review of VCI cases (n = 30)
admitted to these centres for the period 1987 1995 was also undertaken.
Results: A fall in flight was the commonest mode
of injury in both groups. Occupational and
leisure riding accounted for 88% of ASCI and VCI.
The incidence of ASCI is very low in those riding
under the aegis of the Equestrian Federation of
Australia two cases in 21 years; and there were
no cases in the Pony Club Riders or in Riding for
the Disabled. The difference in the spinal damage
caused by ASCI and VCI is in degree rather than
kind. Associated appendicular/visceral injuries were common.
Conclusions: No measures were defined to improve
spinal safety in any form of horse riding. The
possible role of body protectors warrants formal evaluation. Contin