[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srsg + mots - happy couple :-)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: srsg + mots - happy couple :-)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:12:43 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:15:15 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <ubd4kD.A.9t.pkRYDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Paul Benham" <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hello Paul.
>
> > Original poster: "Paul Benham" <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I have measured a few mot's before and after shunt removal. I found
that
> > the output impedance was around 2k with the shunts and around 600R
without.
>
> for my mots (Rpri=2r, Rsec=115r ) 2k it`s about 5.4H, that means the
> coupling is 0.98 - the same as i measured, ok then :-)
> and 600r means that coupling has increased to 0.997 - ha, THAT is a
> "real" tranny, even too much (for such geometry i guess), so probably
> our mots are not so equal :-D
The figures I gave were from memory. I rarely see two MOT's the same and I
have collected quite a few.
>
> > As a result I run with the shunts removed on mine.
>
> the question is - what benefit would we have from this (if any)?
> coz in my case i need about 40H when the coupling is 0.999 - i`m just
> too lazy for this :-)
I removed them to get more power and longer sparks :-)
>
> > MOT's are not the most efficient beasts but they still pack a punch.
The
> > best I have achieved is 81" from two MOT's as a power supply.
>
> it`s not a problem to get 81" - the problem is how long your tc
> would be working, before the mot`ll melt down ;-) i`m building
> _continuous_ duty psu.
Okay. I guess they would not last long if I was running 100% duty cycle. I
run for a couple of minutes at a time maximum.
Cheers,
Paul.