[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srsg + mots - happy couple :-)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: srsg + mots - happy couple :-)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:16:37 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:18:02 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <NcQX7.A.YrH.Vh8XDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Paul.
> Original poster: "Paul Benham" <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I have measured a few mot's before and after shunt removal. I found that
> the output impedance was around 2k with the shunts and around 600R without.
for my mots (Rpri=2r, Rsec=115r ) 2k it`s about 5.4H, that means the
coupling is 0.98 - the same as i measured, ok then :-)
and 600r means that coupling has increased to 0.997 - ha, THAT is a
"real" tranny, even too much (for such geometry i guess), so probably
our mots are not so equal :-D
> As a result I run with the shunts removed on mine.
the question is - what benefit would we have from this (if any)?
coz in my case i need about 40H when the coupling is 0.999 - i`m just
too lazy for this :-)
> MOT's are not the most efficient beasts but they still pack a punch. The
> best I have achieved is 81" from two MOT's as a power supply.
it`s not a problem to get 81" - the problem is how long your tc
would be working, before the mot`ll melt down ;-) i`m building
_continuous_ duty psu.