[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent s.s.t.c work
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Recent s.s.t.c work
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:21:33 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:15:57 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <2oNZY.A.YkF.L_uVDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
On 10/19/05, Tesla list <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Original poster: "K. C. Herrick" <<mailto:kchdlh@xxxxxxx>kchdlh@xxxxxxx>
Nope, no shoot-thru in this instance because no H.V. is applied. I
didn't apply H.V. because I'd need 4 probes to implement 2
differential connections and I only have 3.
KCH
Hi Ken,
I meant shoot through in the gate driver half-bridge that drives the
gate of each main IGBT. No HV would have to present to have
shoot-through there, just the 60VDC present on the drivers.
Anyway, the shift register is an interesting idea, and i will be
curious to see how it effects stability. I would suspect that it
might be just fine working in that manner because 1) you should be
running for just a few cycles, and 2) the frequency of the primary
*shouldnt* shift a whole lot during those few cycles. So chances are
the feedback will be slightly off, but im guessing that its gonna be
much closer to the zero cross than what you have now ;-). The nice
thing about that shift register is that its independent of your
operating frequency (assuming i understand how the shifter
works). Hope that all works out well, good luck! Make sure to allow
for more than enough shift.
Steve