[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thinking About A Geiger Counter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Thinking About A Geiger Counter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:07:11 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:09:40 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <py57HD.A.xPG.S_mgDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jeff Larson" <Jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We use something like this at work when we are in high radiation areas.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G15610&variation=&aitem=1&mitem=1
Check it out. If the device is electrically shielded it should work.
Jeff Larson
> Original poster: <davep@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Various points:
> Chances of x rays from 'usual' size coils is slim going on nonexistent.
> UNLESS Wilfully Attempting to produce them: vaccuum tubes, etc.
>
> If researching for joy of knowledge:
> scintillation counter is the usual spelling.
>
> Happened on a book on 'radiation protection' over the weekend,
> in a used book store (they had a couple, actually...). The
> test_to_qualify portion alone ran near 200 pp. Its not a
> simple subject.
>
> One detector not mentioned, which has possibilities, is the old
> 'pocket dosimeter', which had a charged reed, readable thru an
> internal magnifier. Simple, sturdy, but....
> hard to find, i think,
> and
> It occurs to me that this, and, many, are subject to
> stray effects from High Voltages/fields which 'we'
> routinely deal with.
>
> (There are, i think, sundry dosimeters available,
> commercially, however:
> 1) some seem marketed with more hype than accuracy
> 2) 'all' seem at risk of false readings around HV
> gear.)
>
> best
> dwp
>
>