unsubscribe

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Smith, Charles D. - DIA" <Charles.Smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 6:08 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question

Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson" <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

He, he,

I've contemplated that road once or twice. Lets see, rod stack, pvc
form, much higher L, probably best to submerge in oil, high voltage
transients, nope, I'll stick with the low voltage side simply because
it's easy, stable, and clean. But yes, it could and probably has been
done (I'm assuming you are not suggesting resistive ballasting here).

Take care,
Bart

Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > 1) What decides whether a cap is LTR or STR? The answer is the
> > leakage inductance of the transformer.
> > Now in a NST that is built in, but a pig has practically none so you

> > need to provide your own external ballast. So, it is not the pig
> > itself that determines whether the cap is LTR or STR, but the
> > ballast. (And the transformer turns ratio too, I
> > suppose.)
>
>you guys are making your life more difficult by yourselves, you create
>unnecessary questions by yourselves - the ballast should be at the
>secondary side of the transformer - it`s just that simple. discussions
>on this topic started to appear as early as 96 (if you interested) :-)
>
>-----
>The solution to no primary hits lay in getting rid of the primary!
>This is no joke either.
>20-06-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR
>
>
>
>
>