Re: option 1 or option 2. - Option 3!

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Qndre Qndre" <qndre_encrypt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I am wondering if the salt (natriumchloride) doesn't get 
electroanalyzed, converting it into chlorine and sodium, which are 
both very dangerous substances. Also the transportation is a bigger 
problem with saltwater caps than with MMCs. MMCs look more 
professional and do perform better.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: option 1 or option 2.  -  Option 3!
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:28:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from poodle.pupman.com ([63.225.119.188]) by 
mc11-f10.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 8 Nov 
2005 15:32:38 -0800
Received: by poodle.pupman.com (Postfix, from userid 550)id 
3081F2C04C; Tue,  8 Nov 2005 16:32:23 -0700 (MST)
X-Message-Info: +va6sINXO++XlkzfsVU/wWNN8N2ObyYuGaZwb2z2f7A=
Old-Return-Path: <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Original-To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Resent-Message-ID: <3P3kWD.A.u7G.7VTcDB@poodle>
Resent-From: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/40038
X-Loop: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Date: Tue,  8 Nov 2005 16:32:23 -0700 (MST)
Return-Path: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2005 23:32:42.0263 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[B6D9AA70:01C5E4BC]

Original poster: "Mark Broker" <mbroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Save some money and build a saltwater cap - compared to an MMC it's 
much less expensive, much bulkier, but doesn't perform as well.  Use 
clean glass (beer) bottles filled with saltwater.  A google search 
for "saltwater capacitor" should give plenty of designs and such 
:)  A six-pack in a gallon mop bucket will be suitable for your power supply.

Mark Broker



On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:58:06 -0600, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Original poster: "Langer Giv'r" <transworldsnowboarding19@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi again, since i am using ALL my money to buy caps i need to choose
> wisely...  which one would you guys recommend: (i am using a 10KV
> 23mA OBIT by the way = 6.1nF resonance)
>
> Option one:  5984-940C30S1K-F Cornell Dubilier 3KVDC 0.01uF  5
> strings of 8 pcs each:
>                                         40 caps for total of 6.25nF.
> (x50) 1.23 each for total of $61.50
>
> Option two:  5984-940C30S47K-F Cornell Dubilier 3KVDC 0.047  2
> strings of 12 pcs each:
>                                        24 caps for total of 7.8nF.
> (x25) 2.00 each for total of $50.00
>
> or should i just scrap both those options and go for far larger than
> resonance?  i am of a strictly tight budget.  thanks for all the help
> and hopefully i will finish my first coil within the 6 months ive
> been working on it.
>
> p.s.  why is the voltage of the entire MMC (3KV * 8 = 24000  /   5
> strings = 4800V??) only 4800 volts when the peak voltage of the xfrm
> is 14140V?
> thanks