[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: option 1 or option 2. - Option 3!
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: option 1 or option 2. - Option 3!
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:26:00 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:26:01 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <iuMzgD.A.aaD.IWocDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Qndre Qndre" <qndre_encrypt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I am wondering if the salt (natriumchloride) doesn't get
electroanalyzed, converting it into chlorine and sodium, which are
both very dangerous substances. Also the transportation is a bigger
problem with saltwater caps than with MMCs. MMCs look more
professional and do perform better.
There is just one terminal in the solution, and the current is AC,
not DC. I wonder if some amount of electrolysis may happen, but
anyway both chlorine and sodium don't leave the solution, unless you use
fancy materials for the electrodes. Chlorine attacks copper terminals,
and sodium forms sodium hydroxide.
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz