Terry,
Are you going to allow this kind of b*******? Daniel makes it sound
like that is the introduction to the theory. It was taken out of
context from a discussion on a science/religion site.
Why would you let something like that pass through?
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 5:32 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Wireless transmission of power - Oh the Humanity
>
> Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
>
> (Regarding Dave Thompsons "Secrets of Aether" Book) >"My
> work is referenced, well-reasoned, and based on >empirical
> data." - Dave Thompson
>
> Here is a quote (by Dave Thompson) about his "Secrets of
> Aether" Book from his website.
>
> ***************************************************
> What the theory does show is that:
>
> there is ONE God,
> that this one God gave rise to all physical existence, that
> all physical existence is really not physical at all, that we
> are all equal, that there was life before birth and therefore
> also after death, and that mind exists in 5 dimensions while
> the body exists in only 4.
> Of course, the theory shows much more than that. But what we
> see emerging is a neutral paradigm resembling more of the
> peaceful mystic's teachings, rather than the violent
> teachings of the victorious warlord.
>
> That is one of my most favorite observations about the Aether
> Physics Model, and why I decided to share it with the world.
> The Aether Physics Model is science that encourages world
> peace, whereas the present mass/energy paradigm was developed
> during war and encourages only bigger and more dangerous
> weapons of mass destruction.
>
> The Aether Physics Model not only meets the needs of all
> scientists, but it also leads the masses in the direction of
> peace. How could it be otherwise? A physics that shows the
> physical Universe descends from the Mind of God is a constant
> reminder of our enlightened heritage and encourages people to
> find a way to best get to know this God.
> ****************************************************
>
> After an introductory statement like this, how can anyone
> take this as serious? This guy claims that his work is
> referenced, and based on real-world empirical data and
> presented in a quantitative way, but come on. Do you see
> anything like that in this introductory statement? Please.
> Lets end these threads on free energy and wireless
> transmission of power.
>
> Dan
>
>