[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Litz Wire
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Litz Wire
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 07:58:38 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:00:33 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <qBRyc.A.fqC.N4bLCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Mike Knowlton" <amdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi All,
> I have about 1100ft of 12/36 litz wire, my >understanding is this wire
is good to about 50 khz. If I >wind a secondary with this and it rings at
say 200khz, is >this litz any better than a #30 or #28.
> I built a secondary using Litz wire once (in my early coil >building
days). No significant difference in performance >or Q was noted over using a
suitable gauge of solid Cu. >Litz is usually specified as being most useful
in the MW >broadcast band where the higher frequency
> (smaller) coils operate but by the time you approach >500kHz to 1MHz
> you find that more inductance is better than more Q, at >least for
disruptive discharge coils.
Do recall what size litz you used, it makes a difference,
the ideal wire size is #42 from 200 to about 350khz and #44 from 350khz to
>>No significant difference in performance or Q was >>noted over using a
suitable gauge of solid Cu.
Someone will have to calculate this, I have seen litz make a large
difference in the Q of an inductor.
I hope someone beats me to the calculation, but for now let's agree on a
common wire size for comparison purposes. How about # 22?? and 300Khz for
the resonant freq.
I'm open to change these numbers if some other coilers
have better info.