[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Litz Wire
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Litz Wire
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:31:55 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:32:57 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <SxAnlC.A.xbD.JJlLCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 8 Mar 2005, at 7:55, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Christoph Bohr" <cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Helllo Folks.
>
> I can only watch the list once in a while over the
> alst few weeks so excuse me if I missed something in this
> thread, but one idea came to my mind:
> I do not think ordinary "household" litz wire will do any
> good for a secondary over solid copper, expect when you
> wind a 2 foot diameter coil it might be easier to work with ;-)
Household Litz ??
> But what about that spacial RF litz, that is composed of
> ssingle strands that are isolated from each other.
That _is_ Litz wire. Uninsulated strands don't count.
Malcolm
> I once read about people winding their secondarys in several
> layers claiming imprived performance, wouldn't using this litz
> be more or less the same... several parallel windings with
> exactly the same length?...
> Onca again, just a thought
>
> best regards
>
> Christoph
>
>
>