[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:58:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- In-reply-to: <293e8329465f.29465f293e83@emich.edu>
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- References: <293e8329465f.29465f293e83@emich.edu>
- Resent-date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:58:51 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <EPR8SC.A.dSE.bLDxCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jared,
At 02:29 PM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
.....
L = u Nsqrd pi Rsqrd / (l)
L = u (Wire length)sqrd / 4pi (l)
Jared and Larry
If I look at the secondary inductor here:
10.25 inch dia x 30.0 winding length
1000 turns #24 enameled magnet wire
The wire length is 10.25 x pi x 1000 = 2683 feet
And make the metric conversions:
u = 4 x pi x 10^-7 Wb / (A * m)
10.25 inch = 0.26035 m or 0.130175 radius (m)
30 inch = 0.762 m
2683 feet = 817.9 m
I get:
L = u Nsqrd pi Rsqrd / (l) = 12.566e-7 x 1e6 x pi x 16.9455e-3 / 0.762 =
0.0878 H
L = u (Wire length)sqrd / 4pi (l) = 12.566e-7 x (817.9)^2 / (4 x pi x
0.762) = 0.0878 H
But there is a problem.
I have measured the inductance of this coil for many years in many
different ways (3 sets of inductance meters, 3 frequency generators, 2
counters...) and the inductance measures 0.0754H.
If a double check using wheeler's formula (inch based):
L (uh) = (n x r)^2 / (9 x r + 10 * l) = (1000 x 5.125)^2 / (9 x 5.125 +
300) = 0.0759 H
Some of Paul's and Mark R's programs get closer to the measured value.
So what am I doing wrong?
The meters were all 1000Hz measurements, but the inductance confirms at the
coil's frequency both with a top load and just doing a pure 83kHz
inductance measurement with scope, signal generator, frequency counter and
all... E-Tesla can find the Medhurst and 'with top load' capacitance and
they match right up to 75.4mH in all cases...
So your equation seems 16.4% high and Wheeler's is 1.0% high...
Cheers,
Terry