Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Mike,
With Antonio's brand new TRSSTC engine, we can do Tesla's Colorado Springs
coil now!!! ;-))
However, I don't have Richard Hull's analysis of that coil, and I have no
idea what the numbers are. If anyone would happen to know any of the
following it would sure help?
* Cprimary =
* Rprimary =
* Lprimary =
* Lsecondary =
* Coupling =
* Rsecondary =
* Csecondary =
* Ltertiary =
* Rtertiary =
* Ctertiary =
* VCprimary Initial Value =
* BPS =
* Coil Power Limit (watts) =
This program simulates the structure:
+v1- k12 -i3+
+---C1--R1--+ +--R2--+--L3--R3--+--R4--+
+| + | | + | + | + | +
vin i1 L1 L2 i2 C2 v2 C3 v3 C4 v4
-| - | | - | - | - | -
+-----------+ +------+----------+------+
Courier font ;-)
I can guess at things like the resistances. But if anyone happens to have
a nice list of any of this handy...
Cheers,
Terry
teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Mike,
Tesla should have made it a DRSSTC :o))))
The program only does a conventional two coil system at the moment and
Tesla's coil was a three coil magnifier type system. "I" am not sure
even what model to use there, but Antonio has worked much in the three
coil area...
If the Antonio Engine were modified for a three coil system, adding the
extra elements to the rest of the program would be very easy. One may be
able to simply make the extra elements null values so the two coil case
could still run under the same program... It would really be very easy
to implement once the base model is known...
Of course, the real challenge first was just to get "any program" to
"work". Now we seem to have gotten there and can think about where to go
next. The streamer dynamic load model seems to get a lot of attention too...
I think we should slow down a little and let folks catchup and play with
the program and see where they want it to go next. I have spent all week
working on it and I know there are folks trying to catch up, so I wish to
give them a chance, and for me to "rest" (I never really rest ;-))
It is probably best not to go drastically changing the program at this
point unless a little bug pops up... Keeping the program in one place
allows others to come up to speed without trying to hit a moving
target... I want to spend time now "playing" with the program rather than
changing it :-)) Like Steve Conner, I also have to "fix" my DRSSTC to be
as good as Steve Ward's >:o))) Scan Tesla shows us some pretty obvious
improvements that need to be made!!!
I ponder the contour plots... The DRSSTC seems to be so much better in
every way...... What do all the surfaces mean....
BTW - The www.drsstc.com server and the www.hot-streamer.com server have
their bandwidth now ;-)) I can also answer question off-list if anyone
has any about the program.
Cheers,
Terry
teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 06:12 PM 6/21/2005, you wrote:
Hi Terry,
Now that you have the cool program running to play "what
if" on the coil data, I really do wonder how it thinks it would improve
on Tesla's CS coil that was duplicated as close as could be (the 51
feet diameter one). As you have a lot of data on that coil, could you
run this beast through the computer and see what it would have done
different? (well, besides being a DRSSTC to begin with).
Mike
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: ScanTesla700 - Now were playing with power :-)
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>