[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Streamer length vs. power delivery time...



Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

HI Terry,

On 19 Jun 2005, at 14:50, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> At 09:35 PM 6/18/2005, you wrote:
> >Hi Terry,
> >
> >I ran my coil tonight, posted results (including pictures) on its
> >webpage:
> >
> >http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/DRSSTC1.htm
> >
> >I got 72" strikes with only 6 cycles!!  That should be 8.7J bang
> >energy or about 1044W at 120bps.  The MMC only got to about body temp
> >:-).
> >
> >Anyway, the primary current was up to 700A with air streamers and
> >briefly tripped the 800A limiter during heavy ground strikes.  I will
> >play with the Rprimary in pspice to try to make my primary current
> >match up.  I found Rprimary to be extremely crucial to everything.
> >
> >Also, there is NO energy left in the primary 1 cycle after the driver
> >is shut off (the current hits zero fast).  Pspice did NOT match this
> >with the 6p+220k streamer, in fact it took maybe another 6-7 cycles
> >before the current hit zero.  Something isnt right with the model
> >yet...
>
> Ok,  We'll work on it ;-))
>
> I did verify that ScanTesla and MicroSim give the same numbers:
>
> http://drsstc.com/~terrell/modeling/ScanTesla-vs-MicroSim.pdf
>
> Be "sure" to turn "Skip initial transient solution" off in the
> transient setup box by checking it.
>
> http://hot-streamer.com/temp/MicroSim-Setting.gif
>
> If you don't turn that darn thing off, it pre-charges everything in
> the MicroSim model before it runs...  That was the problem I was
> having last night.  As I suspected, MicroSim was wrong not ScanTesla
> ;-))
>
> I think we need to look at getting a better idea of what Rp "really
> is" for a DRSSTC and maybe looking at what the driver looks like when
> it shuts off.  Cload might also be like 1.5pF/foot too...  Rsecondary
> might need some tweeks as well...  The only way for Rpri to drop off
> really fast is if the driver is really sucking a lot of power back
> out.  Maybe the model is not doing that well...
>
> Beyond that, we will have to start looking into a dynamic streamer
> model as Gerry and all have mentioned..  But Iprimary should work
> regardless....  With your low cycle count, the streamer buildup
> effects are surely far greater that the long established streamer case
> the 1pF/foot+220k model was meant for.
>
> It is cool that we can now get down to verifying these "old" models!!
> That "1pF/foot+220k" thing probably lasted far longer than it should
> have ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
>          Terry

You asked about a model for Rp. Scope photos of single shot gap
events clearly show it is dynamic current-dependent quantity (the
linear ringdown). I have never liked the idea of using a fixed
resistance in place of it and have seen nothing to make me change my
mind. Without delving into it further the dynamic resistance is
inversely proportional to current, possibly to some power. Sorry I
can't help more at the moment.

Malcolm

>
>
> >Steve
> >
> >On 6/18/05, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > > I am having a little trouble getting MicroSim and ScanTesla to
> > > agree about things this night...
> > >
> > > I "think" Rprimary should be about in the 0.5 ohm range for a
> > > DRSSTC. That is a pretty critical factor. We will have to really
> > > test it as time
> > permits...
> > >
> > > So Let me work on it awhile and see if I can fix things...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Terry
>
>
>