[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coupling vs secondary voltage chart
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Coupling vs secondary voltage chart
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:54:18 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:54:04 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <wK5fJC.A.VKB.JnOsCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Terry
> >I think the rate at which the voltage is changing on the toroid is
> >more important than the overall voltage. Low K should take a long
> >time to build up, despite that it may build to a higher voltage. I
> >think overall the sparks will be shorter =\.
>
> Yes! Probably very true! But it appears one does not have to risk racing
> arcs for performance. If K=0.25 or 0.18 the performance is probably "about
> the same". Fascinating that the DRSSTC seems to be so "flat line" for
> output voltage. The rough line seems to be the little bouncing off peaks
> and such as the K is varying. T1 was 300uS.
>
I think 300uS is too long of a time to develop a long streamer. So
really, your plots would look much different i suspect at say
100-150uS? Could you test that out and see what it says? In my
limited experience, i find best "long" streamer production to be had
with shorter T1's in the 100-175uS range, but then again, most of my
coils are maxed out at 200uS, after that the sparks dont grow. Now
the question is: is that a characteristic of the streamer, or
something to do with the coupling and tank surge impedance (shaping
the current envelope)?
Steve