[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (no subject)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (no subject)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:51:39 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:52:29 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <fEkKv.A.zRF.cKFzCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Matt,
On 6 Jul 2005, at 1:35, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know of a sound reason why the secondary coil form
> cannot/should not extend upward through the toroid so that the toroid
> fits around it like a fat ring on a finger? I would prefer not to cut
> this 6" x 72" clear acrylic pipe at this time.
>
> Matt D.
You may find that the smooth/rounded surface of the toroid is
nullified by surface tracking along the upper section of pipe; then
again it might not matter. Since nothing is lost in trying it I'd
just go ahead.
Malcolm