[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1pF+220k....
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 1pF+220k....
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:03:02 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:07:00 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <l-r4_.A.uDE.hXLyCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jim, Terry,
On 2 Jul 2005, at 17:06, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> At 02:59 PM 7/2/2005, Tesla list wrote:
> >Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I now think our long time streamer load estimation of 1pF/foot + 220k
> >ohms (series) for a streamer load we use in models should have the
> >"1pF/foot" part replaced by:
> >
> >The capacitance in pF is:
> >
> >C = 0.0666667 x L from 0 to 30 inchs
> >
> >C = 0.15 x L - 0.25 from 30 to ? inches
> >
> >L is in inches.
> >
> >It really does not change many things much, but there is a lot of
> >hard evidence to support that this is a "better" estimation that
> >agrees with HV leader folks, models, and testing...
>
>
> Hmmm.. While this empirically might work "better", I'm wondering what
> the physical basis is.
>
> Longer sparks will, in general, be created by a higher power source,
> which will have a larger Topload C, which will have higher currents,
> which will make a larger diamter spark channel, but I doubt that
> channel diameter has enough effect on C.
>
> More "furry offshoots" on longer streamers?
>
>
> Here's an experimental idea that might prove useful:
>
> 1) Take a given coil, and figure out a way to measure the C of the
> streamer (change in fres?) at sea level.
>
> 2) Take the same coil, run it in a low pressure environment (i.e. at
> 10000-15000 ft MSL (Drive to the top of Pike's Peak, or some high
> mountain resort), where the breakdown voltage is lower, and hence,
> with the same power input it should make longer sparks. measure the C
> of the streamers.
Piecewise approximations do seem a bit suspicious. I suspect there is
a curve related to a "finger" area at the tip of the easily visible
streamers. I am reminded of the ball of barely visible streamers I
once saw emanating from a spherical topload with no defined spark
channel.
?
Malcolm