[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who all has built OLTCs?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Who all has built OLTCs?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:09:08 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:11:09 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <r4XPeD.A.RZE.MlqZCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Finn Hammer <f-h@xxxx>
You are absolutely correct! Obsolete they are.
Boring perhaps, but super reliable.
And like all the other obsoletes, like the gappers and the single
resonaters, they are perfectly suitable for applications where you have to
turn your back on them, like in Museum and display situations.
Unlike the much fabled about DRSSTC`s which are still prone to blow up any
But different strokes for different folks. Within the next year or so, the
DRSSTC has been debugged, tesla coiling will have made another giant leap
forward, and heaven knows what kind of coil topology will be the
contemporary source of schrapnell.
Cheers, Finn Hammer
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
OLTC means "Obsolete at Last, Tesla Coil"
>OK, I will ask the silly question. What does
>the "OL" mean? (You need to realize there are a lot of us who
>are relatively new to this