[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An internal primary
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: An internal primary
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:09:01 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:09:42 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <_Jd_3.A.v2B.9qvYCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Mike" <mike.marcum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Or you could rig a small gearmotor to expand/contract the primary to
lower/raise the L and coupling.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: An internal primary
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
One could adjust the coupling constant in several ways..
You'd also need some way to adjust the primary L (so as to tune the system,
unless you're doing an all driven, non resonant approach)
One is to put two primary windings inside the secondary and use a variable
transformer (air core, of course) to vary the currents. Perhaps something
like a goniometer? Some horribly complex arrangement of capacitors and
rotating coils with variable coupling?
Make the internal primary/external secondary the second stage of a quadruple
resonance system (like a magnifier...)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: An internal primary
> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On 15 Apr 2005, at 11:52, Tesla list wrote:
> > Original poster: "Daniel A. Kline" <daniel_kline@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:54 PM
> > > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: An internal primary
> > >
> > >
> > > Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > "So, a bipolar coil could maybe have an internal primary...?
> > > Dan K."
> > >
> > > How, pray tell, would you bring the connections out through the >
> > secondary? > > Ed
> > Yeah...I thought of that later on. *laugh*
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > Dan K.
> You could build the secondary in two halves, mount the primary using
> holes near the bottom of one half to bring the leads out, then bond
> the secondaries together. I see doing it as being far from
> impossible. The secondaries do not have to have their base ends
> nested right up to each other. In fact a gap may be required to
> obtain a suitable coupling constant.