[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: joules confusion sort of
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <gary.lau-at-hp-dot-com>
>
> No, the proper gap spacing is one that breaks down at the peak value of
> the power supply. This is determined without the cap, so the cap value
> doesn't enter into it. Now one is free to select the value of the cap,
> and this choice determines what the BPS rate is, typically much higher
> than 120BPS. A static gap will basically never fire at exactly 120BPS
> at the peaks of the charging voltage. Really. Honest, it won't happen.
> Pull out a scope and see.
>
> Gary Lau
> MA, USA
Yes, I believe this as I have scoped it, It may average 120BPS but very
chaotic. Not at all like a SRSG at 120BPS
Gerry R
>
>
> >Original poster: Harvey Norris <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>
> >Isnt Cp irrevelant to the BPS rate, and any small
> >capacity will naturally exibit a 120 BPS rate by the
> >proper gap spacing?
> <mega-snip>
>
> > Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds"
> > <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> >
> > Hi Luke,
> >
> > The true enery per bang will be 1/2 * CV^2. The
> > 900/120 estimate assumes a
> > power factor of 1.0 and a Cp that results in 120
> > BPS.
>
>