[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRSG or ARSG
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
ASRSG's are used for better quenching with high powered pole xmfr systems.
Higher current tries to continue the spark and produces an arc (bad --- no
oscillations).
Dr. Resonance
>
> Why does running an ARSG too slow build up too much voltage on the
> capacitor? A static gap is the ultimate in slow and people use them all
> the time.
>
> Luke Galyan
> Bluu-at-cox-dot-net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:25 PM
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: SRSG or ARSG
>
> Original poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com
>
> In a message dated 1/13/04 9:36:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
>
>
> >May ask why exactly an ASRG is bad for an NST?
>
>
> ASRG can be used, but must not be run to slow or the
> voltage may go to high for the NST if a suitable safety gap
> and protective filter is not used. However the spark lengths
> will probably be poor. A small value cap must be used, which
> will not permit the NST to deliver much power. Many folks
> run the ASRG slow at times without adequate protection
> and destory the NST. Only 120 bps sync will give the
> ultimate in spark length performance with NSTs it seems.
>
> John
>
>
>