[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR cap BPS?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LTR cap BPS?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:16:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:17:44 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <YWGy_D.A.kqC.t0mrBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 11/30/04 9:07:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Well, my question comes from
http://www.classictesla.com/java/javatc.html
Seems like if I use its LTR suggestion, it states 60~ or so BPS at any
decently wide gap setting for the NST.
Is this just the program screwing up and stateing 1/2 the BPS? or is it
really 60bps at those gap settings?
Bart's JavaTC is very good, but I don't think I exactly agree with
his method of figuring the BPS, etc. I don't think JavaTC accounts
for the extra power that can be drawn out an NST beyond its
name-plate rating due to resonant or inductive kick and
input overvolting. This extra power permits the breakrate to
be higher than expected using a given cap value. Perhaps
Bart has updated his program, I don't know. A too-wide
gap will tend to reduce the breakrate of course. I do agree
with Gary Lau's previous comments regarding the breakrate.
John