[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deceptive transformer
Original poster: "Virtualgod" <mike.marcum-at-zoomtown-dot-com>
1000w microwaves at walmart (old, heavy type) go for about $50 when they're
on sale and you get lots of other goodies too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: deceptive transformer
> Original poster: "Jim Mitchell" <electrontube-at-sbcglobal-dot-net>
>
> 66$ for a mot is cheap. New MOTs are 80-100$ AFAIK
>
> Regards - Jim Mitchell
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:53 PM
> Subject: Re: deceptive transformer
>
>
> > Original poster: BunnyKiller <bunikllr-at-bellsouth-dot-net>
> >
> > Yeah...
> > thats Chris... he has a way with words.. always involved with some
> primo
> > laser stuff tho.... he has a good record, but its up to the buyer to
> know
> > what they are buying.... but then again , knowing Chris, he expects
the
> > buyer to be aware of whats up for bid too...
> >
> > but if I were to sell a Powerstat 1256D on ebay and have it go 150$ for
it
> > instead of 60$ I guess I couldnt complain... isnt that what Ebay is
> about
> > ? getting top dollar for your item?
> > I do have to admit tho 66$ for a MOT is a bit pricey but I know
> better
> > now... I made the mistake of paying 165$ for a 1256D ONCE...
> > but I still have it and in the long run it was worth it ...
> >
> > we learn from our mistakes before we know better call it an Ebay
> > learning curve...
> >
> >
> > been there done that
> >
> > Scot D
> >
> >
> >
> > Tesla list wrote:
> >
> > >Original poster: "Richard W." <potluckutk-at-comcast-dot-net>
> > >Hey Godfrey,
> > >
> > >Yeah, I've seen that one (well, "those"). It's been up for quite some
> time
> > >now.
> > >Then add "tesla" and "laser" to the description to round out the
fluff.
> > >But it is rated about 800 volts above the average MOT. Still, I
wouldn't
> bid
> > >on it for that rating and certainly not worth 66 buck in my opinion.
Nor
> > >would I bid on it anyway since I feel drawing arcs like that isn't
> healthy
> > >for the transformer. NSTs are a different story though due to their
> inherent
> > >current limiting.
> > >
> > >Rick W.
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> > >To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> > >Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:23 PM
> > >Subject: deceptive transformer
> > >
> > >
> > > > Original poster: "Godfrey Loudner" <ggreen-at-gwtc-dot-net>
> > > >
> > > > A bit of macabre humor on ebay is shown at
> > > >
> > > > http://cgi.ebay-dot-com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3805950083.
> > > >
> > > > The transformer is partially hidden from view,
> > > > making it hard for the inexperienced to
> > > > recognize it as a mot. The picture is
> > > > designed to focus attention on the arc,
> > > > not the transformer. Hype comes into
> > > > play: "its controlled by an X-ray
> > > > variac".
> > > >
> > > > This time the identity of bidders is hidden.
> > > > Now its is impossible to warn buyers that
> > > > they are being taken for a walk in the woods.
> > > > The mot sold for $66.55, while other sellers
> > > > offering mots were ignored. Awhile back, the
> > > > same seller got almost $100 for a mot.
> > > >
> > > > Godfrey Loudner
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>
>