[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Breakdown voltages of toroids
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
Van de Graaff spheres in the 14, 24, and 30 inch size using 30% smaller
electrodes as the ground terminal, usually break down at 26.5 kV/cm. With
equal sized electrodes we measured a consistent 27-28 kV/cm.
Dr. Resonance
Resonance Research Corporation
E11870 Shadylane Rd.
Baraboo WI 53913
> > > Paschen's
> > > curve I think is where the 30kV/cm is pulled as just about every text
I've
> > > read references the curve, but the curve itself is for 1cm spacing at
1
> > > atmosphere and 25 deg C for conductors of an infinite plane, parallel,
and
> > > perfectly smooth (as quoted from North). If this is case, we know in
the
> > > real world it will always be below 30kV/cm.
> >
> >Yes, but not by much. Note that North uses this value too.
>
> Yes, but also note that North plotted actual breakdown performance of
> spheres as the separation distance changed. All of the sizes at 1cm apart
> broke down at 22kV/cm and to quote North, "which isn't 30kV/cm, but it's
> close". But yes, this is the average field strength across the separation.
> On Figure 7-5, he shows the 25cm spheres at 40cm separation had an average
> field strength of 8.9kV/cm.
>
> > > At Jim Lux's website, the breakdown voltage is expressed as:
> > > Vbreakdown = B * p * d / (C + ln( p * d))
> > > http://home.earthlink-dot-net/~jimlux/hv/paschen.htm
> > > <http://home.earthlink-dot-net/%7Ejimlux/hv/paschen.htm>
> >
> >There is an apparent dimensional error in this formula. p*d doesn't look
> >adimensional.
>
> Can you explain? I didn't write it, but I assume a rule is being broken
here.
>
> >North's formula computes only the maximum electric field. To calculate
> >breakdown voltages, you must assume something about what is
> >the maximum allowable electric field. An independent problem.
>
> Yes, that's where I've pulled in Jim's equation. I'm simply solving for Vb
> from a known Eb (via Norths maxE equations).
>
> >I have now coded an exact series formula for the maximum electric
> >field between two spheres with different sizes and arbitrary voltages.
> >It agrees with my simulations very well, and also with North's formula
> >when the spheres are identical, exactly when the spheres are very
> >close or very distant, and with an error of about 1% when at distances
> >comparable to the radii of the spheres.
>
> Super!
>
> Take care,
> Bart
>
>
>
>