Re: Flat Spiral Secondary - Why?

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "rheidlebaugh by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rheidlebaugh-at-zialink-dot-com>

Akward to make you are correct.Reducing the space between the hot and cold
end, You are correct.Much more compact.A lot of fun to try something
different. A chance to test an idea not tested before. So do it and see.
   Robert  H

> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:25:19 -0700
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Flat Spiral Secondary - Why?
> Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:26:32 -0700
> 
> Original poster: "Alexander Rice by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <alex-at-rices.myip-dot-org>
> 
> Hi All,
> I dont know if I missed something but
> what is the sudden race to build a flat
> secondary, it seems like a rather odd thing to
> do as you are massively reducing the space
> between the hot end and the cold end of the
> winding. Not to mention the fact that the have
> got to be akward to make!
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
>