RE: New Inductance Formula

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jim-at-jlproduction-dot-com>

My God,
Do ANY of you guys really understand all that???
:)
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:02 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: New Inductance Formula

Original poster: "David Thomson by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dave-at-volantis-dot-org>

Well guys, get out your flame torches.  I've got my first practical
breakthrough from the energy pulse model, earlier known as the c^2
theory.  I
was working on my flat spiral/solenoid combination coil today and was
working
with the Wheeler formula for inductance on MathCAD Pro 2000.  When I put
the
Wheeler formula into MathCAD it confirmed my earlier observation that
the
formula was incorrect.  The units in Wheeler's formula results in
meters, not
henries.
 
So I sat down and applied my new understanding of Coulomb's constant
which
identifies conductance as a quality of the aether, along with inductance
and
capacitance.  Coulomb's constant is usually written as:
 
kc=8.988E9 kg.m^3.s^-2.coul^-2 (in the MKS system)
 
but I have found that it can be represent also as:
 
kc=c.Cd.u0.E0^-1
 
Where c equals the speed of light, Cd equals conductance of the aether
(2.112E-4 siemens), u0 equals permeability of the aether, and E0 equals
permittivity of the aether.
 
So from Coulomb's constant the henry can be expressed as:
 
henry=m.c^-1.Cd^-1.(4pi)^-2.10E-7^-1  (ASCII is terrible.  I'll have all
of
this nicely formatted on a web page tomorrow.)
 
>From the above expression of the henry an equation can be assembled for
inductance.  The equation below is the first equation that I am aware of
the
outputs the correct units.  The values are very close to measured
values, but I
need to wind a special test coil by first measuring the exact length of
the
wire to calibrate the equation.  This equation is the basic equation,
but I can
see how to expand it to make it pinpoint accurate and also to account
for flat
spirals and conical coils. 
 
The formula for calculating the inductance of a solenoid coil (or very
close to
it) is derived from the radius, number of turns, and length of wire.
Note, I
said length of wire and not length of windings.  This means this formula
will
also calculate the inductance for the coil plus ground lead if you wish
it to
do so.
 
mH=R^2.N^2.L^-2.c.Cd.(4pi)^-2.10E-4^-1
 
Notice that this formula can easily output millihenries by changing the
power
of 10 from negative 7 to negative 4.  Likewise it will output
microhenries by
changing the power of ten to negative 1.
 
I have tested this formula with three solenoid coils that I had already
wound. 
The results are close.  As I mentioned, I feel the formula can be
improved upon
to give a more accurate result.  This will be done by taking into
account the
impedance of the coil, something other formulas do not do.  
 
I'm expecting the most skeptical folks on this list to provide their
tightest
scrutiny, because this formula is solid evidence that the energy pulse
model is
valid and worthy of being considered as the fundamental model for
energy.  It
is also evidence for the existence of the conductance of the aether and
for the
existence of the aether itself.  I won't respond to questions on this
list in
reference to Coulomb's constant, conductance, or the aether (unless it
can be
shown clearly how it relates to Tesla coils.)  These topics can be
discussed on
the spiral coils list.  But I do encourage Paul, Terry, Bart and the
others to
try out this formula and give your feedback on it.  It could very well
result
in the most accurate and useful formula for inductance yet available.
And like
I said, this is the only formula that I am aware of that yields the
correct
units.
 
Dave