Re: darn the formula torpedoes (3 coils x 2 coils)

["Albert Hassick" <uncadoc-at-juno-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)]

Hi Antonio.  VERY interesting post!  Is it then possible that a Maggie
system may actually be capable of producing more useful output versus a
conventional two coil system even though spark length is the same?  
Could you elaborate more on the premise of faster energy transfer and
would this mean that a maggie may possibly be more efficient in some ways
than a two winding coil?   Would this allow an electrical field to be
produced in a faster manner, thereby increasing the overall field
efficiency in a tertiary arrangement and resulting in a increase of
available power in each 'pulse' of the tertiary coil setup?  Is it not
possible that this is what Tesla was trying to do with his 'world power'
network?    AL


On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 20:46:07 -0600 "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
writes:
> Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" 
> <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br> 
> 
> Tesla list wrote:
> 
> > Original poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com
> 
> > Other comparison tests that were done using both disruptive and
> > tube coils showed the same spark output for the magnifier as the
> > classic coil.  Yes, it is certainly possible that the magnifier 
> will tend
> > to give shorter sparks than the classic coil in direct opposition 
> to
> > what is general believed, but any difference is slight and hard to
> > measure.
> 
> Magnifiers can gain by two reasons. One is that they
> can transfer energy faster. The other is that for the same
> last coil and terminal the primary inductance is really larger,
> the primary current is smaller, the operating frequency is smaller,
> and the losses are smaller, as you mentioned.
> Consider a third coil and terminal with inductance L3 and
> total capacitance C3, and a given primary capacitance C1.
> A magnifier using this third coil must satisfy the relation:
> L1*C1=(L2+L3)*C3
> A conventional coil with the same third coil as secondary
> must satisfy:
> L1'*C1=L3*C3
> Evidently, L1 > L1'
> If you fix identical primary inductances, however, the secondary of 
> the
> two coils system will have more inductance (L2+L3). If the losses
> due to this will be larger or smaller depends on how the coils are
> built.
> The magnifier, however, can always be built to transfer energy 
> faster.
> The maximum output voltage is the same with C1 and C3 fixed, and 
> with 
> the same sizes of the last coil and terminal, the maximum spark 
> length 
> is also about the same. The magnifier will, however, reach the limit
> with less losses.
> 
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
> 
> 
> 
>