Re: Equidrive-ing me crazy
Hi, Please forgive me if I am wrong ;-) , I think that it was a Richard
Hull (or possibly TCBOR?, anonymous?...), that was responsible for its
concept. It does seem to follow a synergistic approach, equally dividing
the C across the primary. But I doubt it would have any "major" benefits
for a less then "fully" optimized coil. Anyone actually see that this made
a difference? I tried it with non equal C with expectable results, but you
must get as close as possible to a balance for any real potential, I suppose...
At 04:17 PM 5/5/00 , you wrote:
>Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
> Each cap would then have to be 0.04 uf. When you put them in series, as
>in equidrive, you get back to 0.02uF again. "I" can't think of any reason
>equidrive whould have an advantage but let us know if you notice anything...
>At 03:26 PM 05/05/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>>I am curious about the capacitor size when they are placed in the
>>"equidrive" position. Say you have a coil that runs perfectly fine with
>>.02 uf wired in series with you primary coil...to run the equidrive, do
>>you need EXACTLY half (.01 uf) at each location? Or do you need EXACTLY
>>twice the total (.04 uf) because the caps are now wired in parallel to
>>YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
>>Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
>>Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: