Re: SCR based coils (was High-Power Car Ignition Coils)
Normal SCR's will switch on only with positive gate current. The max
pulsed value of gate current permissible should be quite a good deal
more than cont. gate current rating - check the spec on the device you
are using though. There is a fairly obscure scr variant known as a GTO -
Gate Turn Off thyristor - in this a + gate current switches the device
on - and this device functions essentially identically to a standard SCR
except that a - gate current will trigger the device OFF. I tested a few
of these that I found recently and noted that the gate current for turn
off is higher than the gate current for turn on. TRIACS are AC switches
and not only will conduct in either direction but can also be triggered
by either polarity of gate current - as there are 4 possible operating
modes here they are referred to as 'quadrants' ie main supp + gate+ /
ms + g- / ms - g+ / ms- g-
operation in 3 of the 4 quadrants is preferred for most triacs, with +
gate current (2cases) being 2 of the 3 preferred (I forget which the
other usual one is). You can get some which are '4 quadrant guaranteed
', but in any case, the + gate modes are generally faster and/or req.
less current. SCR's however are much faster than triacs of equivalent
ratings and so are preferable unless you are req'ing ac switching. dv/dt
exceeding spec'd max may cause false triggering due to current pulse
charging parasitic gate capacitance, and also very important is di/dt -
excess rate of current rise as device switches on can lead to hot spots
in the device resulting in premature failure. Typical stud mount devices
may req around 100ma for trig , hockey pucks can require substantially
more than that. I think a higher gate current will lead to faster turn
on time, but di/dt rating should be observed - External circuit
inductances will have a large effect on this, with some very large scr
systems I have seen using di/dt limiting inductors on each device.
>From tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com Mon Jan 11 19:42:55 1999
>Received: from [18.104.22.168] by hotmail-dot-com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail30935653631708235065324983341653753231330; Mon Jan 11 19:42:55
>Received: (from slist-at-localhost)
> by pupman.pupman-dot-com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA21862;
> Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:08:14 -0700
>Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:00:41 -0700
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
>Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 04:06:05 -0700
>Subject: Re: SCR based coils (was High-Power Car Ignition Coils)
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>X-Mailing-List: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> archive/latest/288
>From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Original Poster: "Harri Suomalainen" <harri.suomalainen-at-pp.inet.fi>
>>Original Poster: "Bill the arcstarter" <arcstarter-at-hotmail-dot-com>
>>The question is how to size the gate resistor. Too large a resistor
>>won't allow a quick turn-on of the part,
>..or won't allow turn-on of the part at all!
>>but too small a resistor would
>>allow a possibly large gate current.
>Large currents are preferred. You should check the data sheets for
>current needed to trigger the device. With large SCR's this may be
>100mA or so!
>Current required depends also on polarity. Typically negative currents
>are smaller than positive current. Negative current is therefore
>Then there is the current rise time: scr will shut down when current
>certain level. This means also that during turn-on pulse current must
>above this value or scr will turn off as soon as the trigger pulse
>>This problem appears to be
>>aggravated by the fact that the voltage across the resistor depends on
>>the firing angle.
>One possibilitity would be using something like a cap charged by the
>of the system as a "floating supply" for trigger current. There would
>>(The circuit doesn't show the 100 ohm 0.1 uf snubber which is attached
>>across the triac terminals)
>Snubbing is a must. Without suitable snubber inductive spike at
>can kill the scr. If it does not kill the scr there can also be very
>which is coupled to the gate through small parasitic cap. This can
>These subjects are covered nicely on some SGS app notes available at
>their web-site. (Sorry, no url)
>>Now I know why most industrial designs use a small pulse transformer
>>between the cathode and the gate - rather than shunting current from
>>anode into the gate...
>That simplifies things. Why would you not use one?
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail-dot-com