Re: Fw: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Fw: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models
• From: "B**2" <bensonbd-at-erols-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <terryf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:27:31 -0600
• Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

Hi John,
    It does seem contradictory.  It is an observation I can't understand.

Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List +ADw-tesla+AEA-pupman-dot-com+AD4-
To: tesla+AEA-pupman-dot-com +ADw-tesla+AEA-pupman-dot-com+AD4-
Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models


Original Poster: FutureT+AEA-aol-dot-com 

In a message dated 98-10-14 21:00:53 EDT, you write:

+ADwAPA- 
+AD4- Hi Bert,
+AD4-     There were at most two streamers at any time.  One was growing
+AD4- while the other one was being absorbed (appearance).  Just as one
+AD4- streamer finished the second would dart out four to five feet from the
+AD4- toroid as a solid trunk with no branches like a tube coil streamer.
+AD4- Then the branches would form outward from the end like a flower
+AD4- blossoming before the eye.  +AD4APg- snip
+AD4-

Barry,

It is interesting that you used the marx generator to re-create the
effect of the TC you saw.   Maybe the original TC was running at
a sub-multiple of 60Hz, this very low break-rate could have caused
the streamers to grow slowly, and given the whip-like sound?

Just a thought.

John Freau

• Prev: Re: spiral secondary ?
• Next: Re: Fw: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread