[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
1/4 wave theory (was Tesla Coil Operation (was -Wire....
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
-
Subject: 1/4 wave theory (was Tesla Coil Operation (was -Wire....
-
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
-
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 23:40:09 -0500
-
Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net
----------
From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com [SMTP:terryf-at-verinet-dot-com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 1998 9:52 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 1/4 wave theory (was Tesla Coil Operation (was -Wire....
>From: Jim Lux [SMTP:jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net]
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 1998 10:39 AM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Wire length,resonance, and Q (fwd)
SNIP>>>>>>>.
>My gut feel is that the dimensions of a typical coil are so tiny compared
>to a wavelength, that the lumped approximation should be more accurate.
>This is good, because it means we can do the calculations of leader growth,
>etc, using a fairly straightforward set of differential equations, which
>can be numerically integrated.
Jim,
I absolutely agree 100% !! You hit it dead on! Only the rarest
coil's top-to-bottom phase shift would approach even one single degree. For
all practical purposes the propagation phase shift in the secondary coil can
be disregarded. It is just a typical lumped inductor.
Terry Fritz