[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Retraces was "Second Light" (fwd)





---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:59:00 -0500
From: "Barton B. Anderson" <mopar-at-uswest-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Retraces  was "Second Light" (fwd)

Michael, Greg, List,

I was also thinking the "retraces" are moving up vertically due to heat. But,
there must be more than just heat to cause an arc to run the same arc
formation. Greg Hunter was thinking possibly the break rate as part of the
reason. Sounds like a good hypothesis. If the photo was set to 4s shutter
speed, and there are about 10 retraces, this equates to 4ms retrace intervals.
This is interesting. In all photos showing this situation, there are several
other arc formations occurring between these arc formations, yet the "retrace"
of the arc in this position changes angle and yet forms the same arc path.
Maybe the more experienced coilers can give further hypothesis on these
interesting arcs?
Bart

Tesla List wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 09:11:00 -0700
> From: Michael Baumann <baumann-at-proton.llumc.edu>
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: RE: Second Light (fwd)
>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:45:57 -0500
> > From: "Barton B. Anderson" <mopar-at-uswest-dot-net>
> > To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> > Subject: Re: Second Light (fwd)
> >
> > Mark, a pictures always worth a thousand words. Nice pics. I'm especially
> > interested in your camera's shutter speed. I see you've captured
> > the infamous
> > arc waves (anyone know what I'm talking about here? is there a
> > term for the arc
> > showing multi-positions with the same arc formation?).
> > Mark, thanks for sharing,
> > Bart
>
> I know exactly what you are talking about. I only wish my scans would
> show it better. Personally I call them retraces - the arc channel
> is rising due to heating, but maintaining the same path (retracing)
>
> http://www.geocities-dot-com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/3574/baby.htm
>
> --
> Michael Baumann  Optivus Technology Inc.|Loma Linda University Medical
> Center
> San Bernardino, California. (909)799-8308 |Internet: baumann-at-llumc.edu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tesla List [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 9:20 PM
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: Second Light (fwd)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >
> > Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 18:11:46 +0930
> > > From: Mark Finnis <mefinnis-at-medicine.adelaide.edu.au>
> > > To: bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com
> > > Cc: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com, USA-TESLA-at-list.iex-dot-net, tesla-at-apex-dot-net.au,
> > >     amf-at-sa.apana-dot-org.au
> > > Subject: Second Light
> > >
> > > Bert,
> > >
> > > OK, pictures as promised.
> > >
> > > Finally finished the rolled caps (using the right equation this time).
> > >
> > > So ........
> > >
> > > First light (alright - second) with proper value caps (albeit
> > made by me)
> > > ........
> > >
> > >         www.health.adelaide.edu.au/icu/images/second_light1.jpg
> > >
> > >         www.health.adelaide.edu.au/icu/images/second_light2.jpg
> > >
> > >         www.health.adelaide.edu.au/icu/images/second_light3.jpg
> > >
> > > Gettin' better .... eh
> > >
> > > The commercial cap arrived yesterday, so looking forward +++ to
> > the weekend
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > Now, how much was that bombarder at 7.5 kVA ....... Hmmmm
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > ___________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Mark Finnis                     Hm:  61 8 82895205
> > > Staff Specialist                        Wk:  61 8 82224000
> > > Intensive Care Unit                     Fax:  61 8 82236340
> > > Royal Adelaide Hospital         Mbl:  041 23242268
> > > www.health.adelaide.edu.au/icu
> > > ___________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >