Coupling loss (was dogma thing) (fwd)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 21:46:57 -0700
From: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Coupling loss (was dogma thing)

>   I now find that the  "John vs Malcolm"  discussion was referring to two
> different things. Malcolm was referring to "transfer is lossless". I was
> referring to "coupling vs tuning". That can be chaos.
>   John Couture

Malcolm specifically stated that transfer is *not* lossless.
I agree that we should keep the chaos to a minimum.