Coupling loss (was dogma thing) (fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Coupling loss (was dogma thing) (fwd)
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 21:32:38 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 21:46:57 -0700
From: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Coupling loss (was dogma thing)

>   I now find that the  "John vs Malcolm"  discussion was referring to two
> different things. Malcolm was referring to "transfer is lossless". I was
> referring to "coupling vs tuning". That can be chaos.
> 
>   John Couture

Malcolm specifically stated that transfer is *not* lossless.
I agree that we should keep the chaos to a minimum.
-- 


-GL
www.lod-dot-org

• Prev: Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
• Next: Re: tuning more accurately than 5% (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread