[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 20:09:10 +0000
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
Richard H. -
In the extreme!? Are you talking about the streamer capacitance?
John Couture
------------------------------------------------------------
At 09:33 PM 7/13/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:22:50 -0400
>From: Richard Hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
>To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
>
>
>
>Tesla List wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 23:37:10 +0000
>> From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
>> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>> Subject: Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
>>
>> Richard, et al -
>
>
>
>> Do you (or R. Hull) have any test data that would show how much the
>> streamer loading, etc. capacitance is and how much it affects the operating
>> frequency after the toroid mounting capacitance change is taken into
>> consideration? As I indicate above the operating frequency change for only
>> the streamer loading, etc. should be very small.
>
>...........................Streamer loading on a real big system is extreme.
>Nemesis' instrumented resonance with top load was 66khz. Running, for best
>spark, another whole turn was required to go to 54khz. I learn quickly to drop
>the calculations and expect at least a full extra turn on all primaries where a
>toroid was used whose diameter was in excess of 100% the coil height. After
>1992 all of my magnifiers used toroidal diameters which approach 200% of the
>resonator coil height. Maggey 11-E uses a 46" diameter toroid on a 12" long
>resonator. R. Hull
>
>.............................