[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Dump the RSG!
From: Malcolm Watts[SMTP:MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 1997 4:37 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Dump the RSG!
Hello Terry,
> From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com[SMTP:terryf-at-verinet-dot-com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 10:10 PM
> To: Tesla List
> Subject: Re: Dump the RSG!
>
> >
> >From: Malcolm Watts[SMTP:MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 2:41 PM
> >To: Tesla List
> >Subject: Re: Dump the RSG!
> >
> >Greg, all,
> > I've been sitting on some Westcode devices (SCRs and
> >diodes) for some time now while agonizing over exactly how to use
> >them without destroying them. The kind of ratings I am talking about
> >(from memory) are 2.5kV holdoff/device (fwd and rev) with current
> >ratings around 2kA or so. di/dt should not be a problem with a
> >sufficiently low frequency coil. The agonizing bit comes from the
> >implications of stacking them. If one turns on fractionally before
> >the other (say two stacked), what happens to the sluggard? Bit of a
> >worry I think?
>
> I know the answer to that all too well!
>
> If they recieve too high of voltage at these currents the junctions
> will breakdown and the device will go to a permanant short. The die will
> simply arc and shatter. They will not handle multiple hits and survive.
> The first over voltage and it is all over. No room for error. Worse yet,
> when one part shorts the rest now see a higher voltage and you risk loosing
> the whole stack. Its sort of sad. They don't make much noise or anything.
> It just stops working and when you go and test them with a multimeter they
> are all just dead. :-(
I don't plan on using them at anything like the continuous current
rating, even peak current will be well below this. di/dt and
operating frequency are inherent limitations here. I certainly
wouldn't allow output discharges to connect with them.
> You really need a voltage protection device across the
> SCRs. We use
> very fast, high power, and very high frequency transorbs that may be an
> option but ours are custom and very expensive. There are off the self
> devices that may work and be cheap (we buy the bare die and package them
> ourselves). The bad part is that you may need some trial and error
> experimentaion to get it right. During development of a RF power supply
> design, we went through $250,000 worth of parts in one month trying to
> getting it right. In the end it worked out great but it's not for the faint
> of heart or wallet.
Needless to say I would not try to run these at full power to begin
with. A gentle ramp up in power to check operational parameters would
be mandatory.
> If you really want to play this game, let me know and I'll give you some
> tips on things not to do!
I'm planning to do it alright. The devices are completely useless for
anything other than doorstops if not passing some current. As I said,
I haven't been in a hurry to rush in before having a very careful
think about it. One doesn't throw a rare opportunity away.
Thanks,
Malcolm