Paralleledneon inductance.

To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Paralleledneon inductance.
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 20:22:28 -0500
Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	daniel_hess-at-VNET.IBM.COM[SMTP:daniel_hess-at-VNET.IBM.COM]
Sent: 	Saturday, August 09, 1997 5:26 PM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Paralleledneon inductance.

Re; Bert;

secondaries. Using the resonant approach, I can run off a pair of
15-60's with 18 gaps (0.5" total) and still hit 300 - 400 BPS. Without
the addtional charging current, this would not be possible. However...
I've also reconciled myself that (per Richard Hull) eventually my neons
are doomed!

Safe coilin' to you!

-- Bert H --

Bert; The portion of your note I've quoted above poses another question;
I run two 15/60's, (and sometimes three or four.) How do I compute the
C/L resonance equation when I have several secondaries paralleled together?

And while I'm at it, mighten I want to avoid, at least to some degree, too
much resonance between my neons and Cpri for the purpose of extending their
lives? I realize that in doing so I may compromise output but then, so does
a burned-out neon.

Sincerely,
Daniel Hess