[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: toroid parts...
Tesla List wrote:
>
> >From chip-at-poodle.pupman-dot-comThu Aug 15 21:17:52 1996
> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 21:11:32 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Chip Atkinson <chip-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Re: toroid parts...
>
> >>>
> Hi All -
>
> Has anyone tried to test these duct toroids for capacitance to compare
> them
> with spun aluminum toroids? They appear to have very low capacitance.
>
> John C.
> <<<
>
> My vast electronic experience says "how can that possibly be true?"*
> I always heard that capacitance is a function of surface area, not
> necessarily material. Perhaps what you are thinking of is that the duct
> toroids aren't as smooth, and thus would dissipate their charge much
> faster than a smoother spun toroid.
>
> I also had the idea that a duct toroid is "virtually" smooth because the
> size of the defects (ridges) are much smaller than the wavelength at that
> frequency. At least that's my understanding from what light does.
> (Someone Pleeease correct me if I'm all wet here)
>
> Chip
>
> *I had enough college physics to realize that it wasn't the major for me.
> Now if I can't fix it by cycling the power, I'm almost stumped :-)
All,
Chip is absolutely correct, of course. Surface area is the factor for
isotropic capacity, not shape, material or surface finish.
The electrostatic linkage between any top terminal and a resonator is
extremely complicated and at least 5 factors can alter the final realized
capacitance of the all-up running capacitance actually realized by the
system's terminal load. Two of these factors aren't knowable to the
experimenter for calculation purposes. (Air or ion cloud load
capacitance- varies with power,temp, pressure, surrounding objects, and
surface breakout factor for the particular geometry- directly affects ion
loading capacitance level). All the other factors are calculable with
any standard computer and solid input data. (No one ever seems to have
solid input data, though.-problem with the builder/user, not the CPU).
Richard Hull,TCBOR